Sunday, January 08, 2006

On 'Chemical Imbalance'

Drug companies spend billions of dollars each year advertising their products. In fact, according to a brilliant expose of the pharmaceutical industry by Dr. Marcia Angell (former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine), drug companies spend about 3 times as much on marketing as they do on research and development!

And they've hit on a particularly effective marketing angle for their profitable line of antidepressant meds: it's all about 'chemical imbalance'. Just tell people they have a brain-related 'chemical imbalance', and most will assume it's a condition that can only be remedied by ingesting more chemicals (i.e., by taking expensive medications).

But this widespread assumption is flawed in its underlying logic. Simply put: medication is not the only way to change the depressed brain. Psychotherapy changes the brain. Pill placebo changes the brain. Exercise changes the brain.

Let's look at this last point in a little more detail. One of the most serious consequences of depression is the fact that it suppresses a key growth hormone in the brain (it's called BDNF, or brain-derived neurotrophin factor). Without adequate levels of this growth hormone, we can't form new connections between neurons, and those new connections are crucial to our ability to form new memories (this is the reason, in fact, that most depressed patients experience poor short-term memory). Over time, low levels of this growth hormone cause key regions of the brain to shrink. That's right: over time, depression causes brain damage.

But when we get aerobic exercise, this triggers a massive increase in the brain's production of neural growth hormone (BDNF). Not only does exercise help protect the depressed brain from damage, but it serves as a powerful antidepressant activity in its own right.

In a landmark study at Duke Medical Center, aerobic exercise (just 3 times per week for 30 minutes) was found to be as effective as Zoloft in the short term, and even more effective than Zoloft in the long-term treatment of depression.

Exercise is a potent treatment for depression. This is why the British Medical Association (a group much less influenced by the drug industry than our own American Medical Association) recently recommended exercise over antidepressant meds as a first-line treatment for depressive illness. The Brits now seem to understand what most Americans do not: chemical imbalance can be remedied by experience, not just medication.

8 comments:

Dr. Deborah Serani said...

Such a great post. It is so important that the public remembers psychotherapy as an agent of change.

~Deb

Psych Pundit said...

Deb,

Thanks. It's truly a shame how few people realize that experience changes the brain.

By the way, I've got a link up to your site now!

Dr. Deborah Serani said...

Just read this press release on Treatment Resistant Depression. You probably have already read it, but I thought I'd send it just incase you didn't... Blogging is so great for collegial sharing.

News Release - National Institutes of Health (NIH): http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/jan2006/nimh-01.htm

~Deb

PS: Thanks for the link!

Daniel Macintyre said...

Excellent post on this subject! I was just a little suspicious of Brittain's objectivity in choosing exercise over drugs. They are just as biased and for the same reasons, it's just that in America, the drug companies give the government money, while in Brittain - because medicine is socialized - the drugs COST the government money.

Psych Pundit said...

Daniel,

You raise an interesting point - in Britain, with its single-payer medical model, there is much greater incentive to keep costs down. However, they also have a mandate to provide treatments that actually WORK, and extensive public accountability on this point. Thus, their emphasis on exercise to treat depression would never hold up to inevitable public and scholarly scrutiny were it not actually backed by solid empirical research (which it is).

In contrast, in the US the incentives are skewed in favor of the most profitable intervention for drug companies. And because they fund the lion's share of research and ad revenue for most scholarly journals (and ad revenue for major network news coverage), it's very hard for anyone to get the word out regarding the mismatch between drug-company hype and the empirical data, which often are at variance with marketing claims.

Ross said...

The popular media also plays a role in the idea of "chemical imbalances". I've read numerous articles where the writer flippantly mentions that depression is now treatable with a wide range of medications.

I also think people want to hear it is just brain chemicals, because they otherwise fear depression is a personal failing.

Alberto Carlos Bustos said...

I ain't no workmouth trynna speak to borgasm, you bet I spit words loud and will cause you spasms. Surfing on your blog feels like a cat in mice's castle, not so happy but crazy eyes wide like Charle's Manson's.... My fellas? They call me Generic Viagra : fluids flow like water in Niagara, hard like stone, firm like bone and nutts about this post. Say say: hard like stone, firm like bone and nutts about this post!

Viagra Online said...

Okay well so I think that is right because drug companies should to spend money in order to marketing their products.